Jet fuel tax does not ‘open N.J. for business’

By Rosemary Becchi, Jersey First
Newark | Oct 24, 2018 at 9:55 am
Op-Ed

Did you hear it? That whoosh sound in the sky? No, it’s not planes from Newark — it’s the sound of more jobs, people and money leaving New Jersey.

Let’s be clear … to fix New Jersey’s flailing economy, we need to cap spending, lower taxes and create an environment where jobs and businesses want to do business and operate in New Jersey. This isn’t rhetoric, it’s what has to happen.

So, it makes the recent rhetoric and actions of Gov. Phil Murphy and our Legislature all the more difficult to swallow.

In an extreme move, the New Jersey Senate in late September approved legislation that would expand our current tax on airlines for “use of fuel” while on the ground — landings, taxiing and takeoffs. This new levy, if approved by the Assembly and signed by the governor, would make Newark Liberty International Airport the most expensive in the nation — for both airlines and passengers. It could also have a devastating effect on business and jobs in our state.

United Airlines, Newark Liberty’s largest tenant, in 2015 moved its Northeastern “hub” from John F. Kennedy International Airport in Queens to Newark. Not surprisingly, United would absorb most of the new hike. Now one of New Jersey’s largest companies, United currently provides more than 400 daily flights and carried 17.24 million passengers out of Newark in 2017. The airline has roughly 14,000 employees at Newark Liberty.

Also, not surprisingly, United is not pleased. Company officials note that the airline has six other hubs, including another on the East Coast at Washington’s Dulles International Airport. As legislation has progressed, a senior official announced, “profound concern that increasing costs could stunt United’s future investments at Newark.” Scott Kirby, United’s president, has previously suggested the airline would like to return to JFK. Kirby has called the move from JFK the “wrong decision.”

United and other airlines may ultimately choose to move their operations if the new tax is enacted. Airlines with no presence in New Jersey are likely to keep it that way.

Doesn’t sound like the governor’s recent rhetoric to ignite growth in New Jersey or his promises to make the state a “visionary leader in our national and global economy” are playing out in actions or deeds.

New Jersey is surrounded by states (except Connecticut) that have low or no jet fuel tax. Similarly, most business and personal taxes in our neighboring states are also lower. Indeed, the proposed jet fuel tax debacle is illustrative of the financial burden imposed on New Jersey residents.

If Trenton wants to fix our economy, we need more than empty words. We need policies that will truly attract new business. Proposals that will lower the tax burden on all of New Jersey citizens and measures to keep spending in check.

Large numbers of individuals and businesses are moving to other states — including our closest neighbors. Wealth is leaving the state quickly. One recent study found that the state lost $24 billion in net adjusted growth revenue over the last 10 years. Nearly 1 million millennials have left the state over the same period.

The jet fuel tax is just another in a long line of bad ideas and policies that drives business out — not into New Jersey.

Yes, that sound you hear: It’s not United flights into Newark. It’s the sound of jobs, people and money leaving New Jersey.

Rosemary Becchi is the president of Jersey First, a nonprofit aimed at reducing the crippling tax burden in New Jersey. She is a strategic adviser and counsel at Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, where she specializes in tax and financial services matters.

ROI-NJ Staff | editorial@roi-nj.com | @ROINJNews